Friday, July 29, 2016

The Democratic Convention or AKA The Socialist/Marxist convention




We suffered through 4 days of efforts by the democrats in their attempt to show their patronage and US loyalty.   It all started with no US flags on display on their first day and outside demonstrators carrying communist flag of the former Soviet Union and other communist countries.  In addition to these demonstrators burning the US Flag, we saw some of these Hillary supporters burn the US flag at the RNC.

On the second day of this Marxist gathering, we finally saw a US Flag on display due to some media organizations mentioning this in their news stories.  But throughout this 4 day debacle we witnessed a dislike for our country, for law enforcement, our military and our constitution.  And yet, the democrats still closed their eyes to Hillary’s dishonesty, lies and lack of trust and her Email scandal that she used to avoid Freedom of Information Act which is why she deleted over 30,000 Emails.  But, these democrats close their eyes to all this since they are only concerned with power and not the people or the constitution.  Controlling the people through power of the presidency and government agencies gives us the tyranny we fought against in the Revolutionary War.   

If anyone reviews the history of Hillary Clinton you realize this is not the person anyone would want as the first women president.  We are a democratic republic and not a socialist/Marxist country that it appears Hillary supported with her speech last night.  

Nobody at this convention discussed the massive $20 Trillion debt, of which Obama contributed $10 Trillion.  For those who do not understand, it is easy to explain that from the first president, George Washington thru the Bush presidency, we never exceeded $10 Trillion in debt.  Yet in just 8 years, Obama doubled that and if you followed Hillary’s speech last night, you realize under her administration, she may increase that by $10 Trillion in just 4 years.  Nobody at this convention even mentioned our burgeoning debt, poor economic growth and the real unemployment numbers that many claim exceed 10%.

Things are not as rosy as Hillary and Obama and their followers claim.  It appears according to those who understand the economy, we may be heading into a recession by the end of the year or early in 2017.   Hopefully, the voters will wake up and realize what is happening or going to happen in this country as well as the world.  I say that since nobody can identify anything important that Hillary accomplished as Secretary of State.  We know she was involved in Operation Fast and Furious, the overthrow of governments in Egypt and Libya, the Russian reset button, followed a few years later with the Russian invasion of the Ukraine and setting up preliminary talks with Iran on the future nuclear treaty.  Those are Hillary’s accomplishments.  Win at all cost is their mantra.  And the cost is our freedoms, liberty and country.

Thursday, July 28, 2016

Get Ready for Executive Amnesty Round Two



Posted By Keith Koffler On July 28, 2016 @ 5:12 AM In Poli | Comments Disabled 

Hillary Clinton is signaling she will move fast and furiously to force upon the nation President Obama’s drastic and unconstitutional executive actions legalizing millions of illegal immigrants, putting them on a path toward permanent citizenship — and Democrats on the path to a permanent majority.

The signal that Clinton will act by fiat, and quickly, was ironically sent by her vice president as part of a pledge to abide by constitutional norms and push “comprehensive immigration reform” through Congress.

Here’s the problem with that strategy, a problem Clinton and Kaine are well aware: It has no chance of succeeding.

“Hillary will do that in the administration’s first 100 days,” newly minted vice presidential pick Kaine told Telemundo. “She is going to make a big effort in Congress to get reform passed, and with my experience in the Senate, with bipartisan colleagues, I am going to work hard — especially in Congress — to help this effort.”

Here’s the problem with that strategy, a problem Clinton and Kaine are well aware of: It has no chance of succeeding. What will succeed, however are executive actions that will be confirmed by a Supreme Court she will get to appoint, including the replacement for stalwart conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.

In 2013, with the Senate in Democratic hands, a comprehensive immigration reform bill pushed by the treacherous, bipartisan “Gang of Eight” passed the Senate. The House refused to take it up, and one of the Gang, Sen. Marco Rubio, admitted in 2015 that the votes weren’t there in the House to pass it.

Today, the landscape in Congress for immigration reform is entirely different, and comprehensive immigration reform has even less chance of passing.

If there was one issue that dominated all others in the 2016 campaign, it was Donald Trump's winning pledge to build a wall on the border with Mexico. Rubio's membership in the Gang of Eight may well have cost him the nomination. Even two years before Trump, then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor was destroyed in a GOP primary by a college professor, David Brat, who pounded Cantor as too soft on immigration.

Today, cooperation from Republicans needed to pass immigration will be found only among Republicans who enjoy ruinous primary challenges. If there is any lesson to be drawn from the GOP primaries, it is that the GOP base is implacably opposed to legalizing illegal entrants and wants to stop the endless wave of immigration that is transforming the nation's culture. Republicans with the most rudimentary of political compasses will understand that they cannot possibly support a Clinton/Kaine immigration initiative and survive.

The Senate is likely to remain in Republican hands, and the House almost certainly will. Immigration reform will not pass Congress.

The insincerity of Kaine's rhetoric is clear from his plan to "control the border," which seem to have little to do with the basic Republican insistence that illegal immigration be physically blocked. He seems to blame Americans for the problem and his solution involves combating societal ills.
Today, the landscape in Congress for immigration reform is entirely different, and comprehensive immigration reform has even less chance of passing.

If there was one issue that dominated all others in the 2016 campaign, it was Donald Trump's winning pledge to build a wall on the border with Mexico. Rubio's membership in the Gang of Eight may well have cost him the nomination. Even two years before Trump, then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor was destroyed in a GOP primary by a college professor, David Brat, who pounded Cantor as too soft on immigration.

Today, cooperation from Republicans needed to pass immigration will be found only among Republicans who enjoy ruinous primary challenges. If there is any lesson to be drawn from the GOP primaries, it is that the GOP base is implacably opposed to legalizing illegal entrants and wants to stop the endless wave of immigration that is transforming the nation's culture. Republicans with the most rudimentary of political compasses will understand that they cannot possibly support a Clinton/Kaine immigration initiative and survive.

The Senate is likely to remain in Republican hands, and the House almost certainly will. Immigration reform will not pass Congress.

The insincerity of Kaine's rhetoric is clear from his plan to "control the border," which seem to have little to do with the basic Republican insistence that illegal immigration be physically blocked. He seems to blame Americans for the problem and his solution involves combating societal ills.

"Now we understand the reasons why those children are coming here," he told Telemundo. "Americans buy illegal drugs from south of the border, and the money from those drug deals goes back south. In societies like Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador, that money becomes a source of corruption and violence.

"Many of the children who are traveling thousands of kilometers to come here are escaping from the consequences of illegal drugs."
He thinks, having lived in Honduras as a young man, "I could help work with the governments there to support their efforts at economic development, to combat the violence."

Once it quickly becomes apparent that immigration reform is stillborn on Capitol Hill, Clinton will take a dog-eared page out of President Obama's playbook and accuse Republicans of "obstructionism" and declare that the immigration problem must be addressed "for the good of the nation" with legislation being written and passed in the West Wing instead of by Congress.

Obama took extra-consitutional action and was batted down by the Supreme Court, which blocked his decree legalizing millions of illegal immigrants who are parents of legal residents. What Clinton and Kaine surely know is that they won't be facing the same problem.

Obama's end run around Congress was stopped by a lower court and the ruling was let stand by a deadlocked 4-4 Supreme Court, which would have rejected it outright had Justice Antonin Scalia not passed away. During the same 100 days Clinton and Kaine will ostensibly be trying to push doomed immigration, the White House on a parallel tracking will be working to have Congress confirm a new justice who will provide the fifth vote needed to uphold the executive action written by Obama — and whatever other decrees Hillary and her claque can think of. By the time Hillary and Tim recoil in "disgust" from Congress, a new justice will be in place to solve the problem.

In short order, Democrats will have added millions of new legal residents who broke the law by sneaking into the country, and Democrats will have put on a track to full citizenship millions of new Democratic voters who will be primed to help re-elect Clinton in 2020.

It's a brilliant plan. And it demonstrates just what is at stake in the 2016 election. Hillary will probably get to appoint yet more Supreme Court justices during her first term. The ability of the Court to rubberstamp Clinton's and future Democratic presidents' immigration fiats will become insurmountable, possibly for a generation.

And no amount of raising Cain by the right will stop it once Americans have raised Kaine to the vice presidency.

Article printed from LifeZette: http://www.lifezette.com

Why Socialism/Marxist have always failed.



This shows why socialism and Marxist ideology that has been running rampant in the EU does not work and why the EU will collapse under its own weight.  As Margaret Thatcher once said, “Socialism is great until you run out of other people’s money”.   When you start a job in the EU you automatically receive at 6 week vacation and extensive sick leave pay.  So, in order for a business to stay in business they must hire additional employees to fill the void when others do not show up for work either due to vacation or sick leave.  Consequently, you wind up with too many workers and not enough work and businesses struggle to stay open.  And some people wonder why some EU countries have unemployment exceeding 25%.  This article shows the end result.  But sadly, this is the type of country Obama, Hillary and her Marxist friends want to force on our country.   We all know that if you work hard you can be successful and provide for your family.  This has been the work ethic of our country for over 200 years and why people come into this country legally or illegally, to make a better life for themselves and family.  Of course, people like Obama and Hillary are clueless on hard work ethics since just about everything was handed to them.  So, if Hillary gets elected this November be prepared for a continual collapse of our country as the Obama programs will continue and our weak congress will only sit and watch and not take action they have the authority under our constitution. 
Bore Out: French Executive Sues Over Boring Work Conditions
 
There is a rather bizarre lawsuit in France that is likely to reaffirm the view of many that the French labor force is noncompetitive due to long-standing expectations of employees about mandatory work conditions, vacations, and protections.  Frederic Desnard wants 360,000 euros (£300,000) under a claim of a “bore out” or boredom’s equivalent of burnout.
Desnard says that he is being  “killed professionally through boredom” by his 80,000-euro-a-year job. He is  an executive in a perfume business.  Frankly, as the grandson of a coal miner on my Italian side and a cooper on my Irish side, I find the notion of a protected right to be engaged and excited by work to be rather precious.  We should all strive for such fulfillment and you can quit to secure more engaging employment. However, to sue your employer because you are bored is rather presumptuous in my view.  Many people are struggling to find employment today and only dream of a job with this type of compensation.
Yet, experts say that bored employees represent a serious health crisis and one expert,Dr Sandi Mann (referred to as a “Boredom expert” in these articles),says that workers likely die earlier to the boring conditions.
I do not question the health impact of such work, but I cannot imagine a legal basis for such a claim — or a way to rationally distinguish between jobs that are mildly engaging and jobs that are legally boring.