Thursday, February 27, 2020

Seattle Is Socialism’s Laboratory, and It’s Not Pretty




February 27, 2020


Democratic socialists are in the middle of a hostile takeover of the Democratic Party. Led by the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign and the “squad” of newly elected congresswomen, the hard-left coalition has laid out an ambitious agenda to transform the United States into a democratic socialist nation. While many commentators have dismissed the rhetoric around the Green New Deal, Housing for All, and End Cash Bail as pie-in-the-sky abstraction, in Seattle, the socialist coalition is quickly translating this agenda into a political reality.


After the socialist Left’s stunning victory over business-backed moderates in last year’s municipal elections, Seattle has effectively become the nation’s laboratory for socialist policies. Since the beginning of the year, the socialist faction on the Seattle City Council has proposed a range of policies on taxes, housing, homelessness, and criminal justice that put into practice the national democratic-socialist agenda. In the most recent session, socialist councilwoman Kshama Sawant and her allies have proposed massive new taxes on corporations, unprecedented regulations on landlords (including rent control and a ban on “winter evictions”), the mandated construction of homeless encampments, and the gradual dismantling of the criminal justice system, beginning with the end of cash bail.

Seattle’s socialists have established a narrative that provides the rhetorical basis for their policies. They argue that the corporate-technological elite, led by companies such as Amazon, has hoarded the rewards of the digital economy and created widespread misery for workers, renters, and people of color. As Seattle-based commentator and Marxist theoretician Charles Mudede has written: “We are in the 21st century. We are in one of the richest cities on earth. And yet, the old war between those who employ labor and those who sell their labor is still very much with us.”


In the socialist vision, the “new class war” is now entering a more direct phase of conflict. They have launched a political campaign to dramatically curtail the power of corporations, landlords, and traditional neighborhood interests, and to build a coalition of socialists, progressives, unions, and the dispossessed that is capable of achieving power. In short, the solution to the class war is to win the class war.

While conservatives and moderates have typically dismissed the socialist movement as a “big-city problem,” the new socialist agenda is no longer confined to the municipal boundaries of places such as Seattle, San Francisco, and New York. Increasingly, the hard-left coalition has turned these cities into “laboratories for socialism,” with the goal of eventually commercializing their policies through the national Democratic Party. Already, Bernie Sanders, the current front-runner in the Democratic primary, has proposed a nationalized version of the Seattle agenda: Tax Amazon, enact national rent control, construct public housing, and end cash bail.

But Seattle’s socialists have gone one step further. In order to consolidate their newfound power, the progressive-socialists have begun to manipulate the democratic process in their own favor: first, by providing all Seattle voters with $100 in taxpayer-funded “democracy vouchers,” which are easily collected by unions, activists, and socialist groups; and second, by implementing a ban on corporate spending in local elections by companies like Amazon. At the same time, black-bloc activists and Antifa militants intimidate any potential opposition by disrupting events, vandalizing homes, and even orchestrating death threats against political adversaries.

What can opponents of socialism do? First, recognize that it must be fought on all fronts. While the socialists form a small minority of the national electorate, they have demonstrated the capability of seizing power in America’s major cities, which are home to much of the digital “means of production” in tech, media, advertising, entertainment, and research. The business sector in cities such as Seattle must recognize that the progressive-socialists are no longer interested in gaining reasonable concessions; they intend to overthrow capitalism itself.

Over the past decade, the dominant corporate strategy has been to quietly advocate for neoliberal economic policies, while pandering to the cultural mandates of “diversity and inclusion.” That era is now over. As the experience in Seattle reveals, the socialist Left cannot be appeased on cultural issues — they are fighting a war against capital and they intend to win it.

If the business sector wants to protect its own interests, it must rapidly adapt to this new reality. It’s no longer enough for local Chambers of Commerce to drop leaflets before local elections; they must build a permanent counterbalance to the progressive-socialists. They must begin by commissioning original policy research, funding local neighborhood groups, and building a political alliance of conservatives, moderates, and old-line liberals. In other words, they must reestablish a balance of power in America’s cities.

If nothing is done, the laboratories of socialism in America’s cities will become a national problem. It’s time to shut them down.
Yet, the idiots supporting Bernie are clueless to what socialism is.  They are under the illusion they will get a ton of free stuff and it will not cost them anything.  If they would just take time out and review what has happen in Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea and how it has affected Honduras over the years, they would realize they are giving up all their freedom for false and lying rhetoric.  Just ask Cuban and Venezuela refugees.  Naturally, Bernie's response always is, his idea is better.  Same thing Cuban and Venezuelan people were told.  Socialism, Marxism and communism are all the same and they destroy human life and produce only misery.  


Thursday, February 20, 2020

What the Socialist Democratic Party did to Social Security


Using the Google search, this site comes up quickly.  Yet the socialist want to claim the republicans want to hurt your social security.  If you don't know, you are missing out on important information and believing the lies.

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwPEWiNadhA


The Socialist Democratic Party and Candidates and Electoral College.




It appears the presidential candidates running for the highest office in our country do not know the difference between a democracy and a republic.  We are a constitutional republic that our founding fathers knew would separate us from the rest of the world.  Yet, it seems our presidential candidates are not aware of this as they continue to call us a democracy.  I wish one of the moderators at the debates would question the candidates on this.



In addition, the Electoral College was put into the constitution so all votes would count.  The Founders knew with the original 13 states, that a few state would control the vote if we elected our president by popular vote.  Today, no more than 9 states could dominate the election process if we had the popular vote and the rest of the states would be meaningless.  That is why the Electoral College must remain so all votes count and not just a select few from the most populated states.

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Pete Buttigieg, where he stnads on the issues


"[Pete Buttigieg] wants people to see him as a moderate, but he is as far left as all the other candidates.


Here are just a few example of where Buttigieg stands on the issues:

·         Supports late-term, partial-birth abortion

·         Eliminate the Electoral College

·         Buyback program for assault weapons

·         Raise the federal minimum wage to $15/hour

·         Expand Medicare

·         Decriminalize illegal immigration

·         Pay for infrastructure through changing taxes on corporations, the wealthy

·         Study reparations

·         Legalize marijuana

·         Increase existing taxes on upper-income Americans

·         Cancel some student debt


Wednesday, February 12, 2020

The Socialist Democrats Presidential Candidates and the real Pete Buttigieg






We know that Bernie Sanders is an avowed communist, who honeymooned in the former Soviet Union and tries to pass himself off as a socialist, like there is a difference.  Sen. Warren is another socialist that believes government knows better than you.  Sen. Klobuchar will not go to far and will not make it.  But, besides Bloomberg, the other candidate the socialist party may push is Pete Buttigieg.  So, who is the real Buttigieg.



Pete Buttigieg's father was a Marxist professor who lauded the Communist Manifesto



by Emily Larsen & Joseph Simonson | April 02, 2019 1 



The father of Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg was a Marxist professor who spoke fondly of the Communist Manifesto and dedicated a significant portion of his academic career to the work of Italian Communist Party founder Antonio Gramsci, an associate of Vladimir Lenin.



Joseph Buttigieg, who died in January at the age of 71, immigrated to the U.S. in the 1970s from Malta and in 1980 joined the University of Notre Dame faculty, where he taught modern European literature and literary theory. He supported an updated version of Marxism that jettisoned some of Marx and Engel's more doctrinaire theories, though he was undoubtedly Marxist.



He was an adviser to Rethinking Marxism, an academic journal that published articles “that seek to discuss, elaborate, and/or extend Marxian theory,” and a member of the editorial collective of Boundary 2, a journal of postmodern theory, literature, and culture. He spoke at many Rethinking Marxism conferences and other gatherings of prominent Marxists.

In a 2000 paper for Rethinking Marxism critical of the approach of Human Rights Watch,



Buttigieg, along with two other authors, refers to "the Marxist project to which we subscribe."

In 1998, he wrote in an article for the Chronicle of Higher Education about an event in New York City celebrating the 150th anniversary of the Manifesto. He also participated in the event.



"If The Communist Manifesto was meant to liberate the proletariat, the Manifesto itself in recent years needed liberating from Marxism's narrow post-Cold War orthodoxies and exclusive cadres. It has been freed," he wrote.



"After a musical interlude, seven people read different portions of the Manifesto. Listening to it read, one could not help but be struck by the poignancy of its prose," he wrote. The readers "had implicitly warned even us faithful to guard against conferring upon it the status of Scripture, a repository of doctrinal verities."



“Equity, environmental consciousness, and racial justice are surely some of the ingredients of a healthy Marxism. Indeed, Marxism's greatest appeal — undiminished by the collapse of Communist edifices — is the imbalances produced by other sociopolitical governing structures,” Buttigieg wrote.



Paul Kengor, a professor at Grove City College and an expert in communism and progressivism, said Buttigieg was among a group of leftist professors who focused on injecting Marxism into the wider culture.



"They’re part of a wider international community of Marxist theorists and academicians with a particular devotion to the writings of the late Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci, who died over 80 years ago.'



Gramsci was all about applying Marxist theory to culture and cultural institutions — what is often referred to as a 'long march through the institutions,' such as film, media, and especially education," Kengor told the Washington Examiner.



Pete Buttigieg, an only child, shared a close relationship with his father. In his memoir Shortest Way Home, Pete called his dad a “man of the left, no easy thing on a campus like Notre Dame’s in the 1980s.”



He wrote that while he did not understand his parents’ political discussions as a young child, “the more I heard these aging professors talk, the more I wanted to learn how to decrypt their sentences, and to grasp the political backstory of the grave concerns that commanded their attention and aroused such fist-pounding dinner debate.”



Pete wrote that his dad was supportive when he came out as gay. He and his husband bought a house in South Bend around the corner from his parents, which gave the couple “a good support network despite our work and travel schedules” when they decided to get a dog.



The elder Buttigieg was best known as one of the world’s leading scholars of Gramsci.

Gramsci thought cultural change was critical to dismantling capitalism. Nevertheless, although critical of certain aspects of Bolshevism,



Gramsci endorsed Vladimir Lenin’s “maximalist” politics and identified within the Leninist faction of the Italian communists. He went to Moscow in 1922 as the official representative of the Italian Communist Party and returned home to lead the resistance against Italy’s Prime Minister Benito Mussolini, on the orders of Lenin, while his new wife and children stayed in the USSR.



Those efforts landed Gramsci in an Italian prison, where he lived much of his brief life, which ended in 1937 at the age of 46. Yet his time behind bars was also some of his most prolific, leading to a collection of essays called the Prison Notebooks. Buttigieg completed the authoritative English translation of Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks, and his articles on

Gramsci have been translated into five languages.



Buttigieg was a founding member and president of the International Gramsci Society, an organization that aims to “facilitate communication and the exchange of information among the very large number of individuals from all over the world who are interested in Antonio Gramsci's life and work and in the presence of his thought in contemporary culture.”



In 2013, Buttigieg spoke at a $500,000 outdoor New York City art installation honoring Gramsci.

Joseph Buttigieg, presidente International Gramsci Society. #GramsciMonument pic.twitter.com/suFbkEZCZK

— Manuela Cavalieri (@ManuelaCav) August 10, 2013

Buttigieg died just days after Mayor Pete announced his 2020 presidential exploratory committee.



Lis Smith, communications adviser for Buttigieg’s presidential exploratory committee, declined to comment on how his father influenced his political beliefs or on Pete Buttigieg's thoughts on Marxist thinkers such as Gramsci.



Pete Buttigieg said in an MSNBC interview on March 20 that he considers himself a capitalist but that the system needs changes.



“The biggest problem with capitalism right now is the way it's become intertwined with power and is eroding our democracy,” Buttigieg said, noting the influence of big businesses in government.



A self-described progressive, Buttigieg has called to abolish the Electoral College system, supports a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, and thinks that climate change is a national security threat.



In another MSNBC interview in February, Buttigieg said that socialism “is a word in American politics that has basically lost all meaning” and “has been used as a kill switch to stop an idea from being talked about.”



After his son won his mayoral election in 2011, Joseph Buttigieg told the Notre Dame student newspaper that he never expected him to run for office.



“I know Peter has been interested in politics for a long time,” Buttigieg said. “At home we always discussed government affairs, but never in that way …




Wednesday, February 5, 2020

State of the Union Speech






While the president was outlining what the country has accomplished over the past year, the Pelosi led socialist sat on their hands.  We elect people to the White House and Congress to work together to make our country successful.  Whether you like the president or not, one must put the interest of the country above politics.  However, much of what the president said in his speech was accomplish with little support from the socialist party.  In fact, when the president started quoting statistics on low unemployment among minorities, better opportunity for minorities as well as the tremendous increase in female employment over the past two years, the female socialist members of congress just sat on their hands and did not applaud these accomplishment.  It was obvious that they have little regard for anything accomplished that is good for our country simply because it has happened under the Trump administration.  The hate these people have for this president and for any success for our country was on display last night and only magnified even more when Pelosi tore up a signed copy of the president’s State of The Union speech. 



The socialist party is dominated by hate, have no intention of improving our country or the citizens and will continue to undermine anything this president does to make our country great.  It is obvious from what was on display last night that these socialist prefer our country to fail and hate those who opposed them.  Or should I say, expose them.


Tuesday, February 4, 2020

The socialist and Impeachment






Let me get this straight.  Schumer and his fellow socialist are calling out the senate on not allowing witnesses to the senate trial.  Now, when the House was conducting their investigation (phony investigation I might add), they did not permit the republicans or President Trump Due Process, by allowing the republicans to call witnesses and permitting the Trump attorneys to question all witnesses.  This was a one sided hearing where the defense could not actively participate, but had to sit and endure the Shifty Schiff fiasco of lies, innuendos and false testimony.  


So, we must forget all that and bow down to the socialist party demanding the senate allow them to call witnesses to further their lies and drag out his process for eternity or as long as Trump is president which will be another 4 years.  Naturally, the socialist would allow the republicans who control the senate to call witnesses, except they could not be Hunter, Joe Biden or the whistleblower that was a set-up by shifty Schiff to be used as the impetus for an impeachment hearing.  So, if someone accuses you of a criminal allegation, under the Shifty Schiff rules of socialist legalese, you will not be permitted to defend yourself.

Real Ukraine Scandal



Ukraine donated more money to the Clinton Foundation than China, UK, France, Germany or Saudi Arabia. 


Why would all this cash be coming from tiny Ukraine? 

Because tiny Ukraine was the recipient of billions of dollars in US-taxpayer funded aid. It’s a million miles away. No one was watching. Leading Democrats extorted kickbacks on all this US foreign aid. 


Democrats under Obama got rich. Democrats treated Ukraine as their personal fiefdom. This is how politics works in the DC Swamp. 


I’ve been writing about the role of the Clinton Foundation for years. It’s my opinion the central role of the Clinton Foundation is to extort and launder bribes from foreign countries. 


But if I’m wrong, why is this US charity based offshore? A charity owes no taxes on donations. So why not base your bank accounts in the USA? 


Because they don’t have to report to the US government what comes in, or where the money is going. Simple: Offshore = no reporting. The Clinton Foundation could not afford to have anyone look at their books. 


In my opinion, Hillary was running her version of the Gambino Crime Family slush fund. Jimmy Hoffa and the teamsters had nothing on the Clintons. And everyone in the Democrat Party and Deep State got a piece, to insure no one would rat. 


Ukraine is the key to this massive Democrat scandal. But Biden was just the tip of the iceberg. This is all about the Obama and Clinton Crime Families.



I believe Trump’s phone call to Ukraine’s president set off alarm bells. Trump is digging in places no one has ever dared dig before. He could expose the extortion and bribery racket of leading Democrats. That’s why the Deep State decided to come after Trump. He’s messing with their livelihood. He’s upsetting their apple cart. If he’s allowed to investigate, the jig is up. 


I believe Obama named Biden his sacrificial lamb, just in case Hillary didn’t win and all of this could not be covered up. Biden is a crook. But he’s a careless fool too. It was easy to make him the fall guy. 


Trust me. This is Obama and Hillary’s scandal. Biden is just an order taker. 

So, let me make 
this clear to Democrats: We have your number. Justice will be served.  


This isn’t Ukraine. We don’t punish the investigator in the United States of America. We punish the criminals. 


Enter Joe Biden. Few in the Democrat Party wanted an old white guy as the nominee anyway. Especially Obama. In order to frame Trump, Biden had to be sacrificed. In my opinion, this second-hand “whistleblower” was meant to kill two birds with one stone: Trump and Biden. Biden is the Democrats’ fall guy.




Saturday, February 1, 2020

Impeachment debacle finally over




This whole silent coup was finally brought to an end on Friday when the Senate voted 51-49 not to allow new witnesses in the Senate trail.  Since it will take 67 votes to remove the president on these phony charges that will never happen come Wednesday.  If the House socialist democrats actually held a fair hearing they would have subpoenaed all the witnesses they wanted and allowed the republicans to bring in their witnesses.  However, the socialist democrats did not allow any republican witnesses or the president’s attorneys to be permitted in the hearing.  All the witnesses allowed at the house hearing were only those allowed by the socialist democrats and no republican witnesses.  Yet, when this debacle was given to the senate, all of a sudden the socialist democrats wanted to call more witnesses that they could have subpoenaed in their house hearing.  So, they had 17 witnesses in the house hearing, the republicans were not allowed any, but they wanted more witnesses introduced into the senate trial.  This was just another attempt to drag this debacle out as long as possible during this election year.  When the house gives the senate all the documents for the senate hearing, they cannot decide all of a sudden that they want more witnesses.  They had their chance and it was the senate’s turn.  Pelosi and company were under the illusion they could manipulate the senate into introducing more witnesses into the senate trial that they did not want to bring into the house impeachment hearing.  

They came close to succeeding when two RINOS, Collins and Romney supported this socialist initiative.  Sen. Collins has always been wishy washy but Romney is jealous that Trump got elected who had no political experience.  The fact that Trump had more experience dealing with foreign countries and their governments during his nearly 50 years in business than Romney ever had or will have is beyond Romney’s brain.  In fact, this is what has been driving this entire impeach Trump since even before he was elected.  Trump was no part of the swamp and if he became president he would expose them.  Well, that is what we are seeing just about every day.  The corruption within our government is being exposed when we see the non-elected bureaucrats under the belief that they make policy, both domestic and foreign and not President Trump.  President Trump has exposed this and we will see more astounding information when the Barr/Durham investigation comes to light.  This is what the socialist democrats and the other swamp creatures’ fear and they are still trying to get President Trump removed from office and stop the Barr/Durham investigation.  Remove President Trump and VP Pence will not be far behind and then Pelosi becomes president.  Makes one want to throw-up as our constitution will be destroyed as power will be in the hands of these radical socialist as they dictate what we can and cannot do.  Where we live, what we can drive and what we will eat will be on their agenda as the globalist will be in control and we can go to hell.

We need President Trump to continue exposing these globalist elite who believe they know best on how we should live.  This next election will either witness a continuation of defeating these global elitist or from what the socialist presidential candidates are proposing, our demise.