Real or Fake?

We now have a suppose threat against our embassy or embassies in the Middle East.  This is surprising since we had a president that went on his apology tour through the Middle East proclaiming the United States apologizes for all the world problems that have occurred since our existence.  We also know that he did not take Air Force 1 for this tour, but actually walked on the water. 

This president stated during the 2012 campaign that Al Qaeda was on the run.  We know that our president is a Muslim sympathizer which is the reason we do not have a war against jihad radical Islam and Major Hassan was involved workplace violence and we are performing overseas continuance operations.   

So, with the news from CNN that the CIA was on site during the Libya and were involved with running guns through Turkey to the Syrian rebels, we now know why this administration was and is involved in a coverup.  It is also known, that on 9/17/2012, Glenn Beck said at that time through his informers in Washington, that Ambassador Stevens was involved with the CIA in running guns and this was the reason he met with a Turkey representative just hours before the Libya attack.  Ambassador Stevens has performed work with the CIA before and this is why he was sent to Libya to negotiate weapon transfer form Libya to Syria.   

So the questions to ask ourselves is:  With the information last week on CIA operations in Libya, is this just an alert to change the story on the Benghazi attack or something that has truth?  Why do we have to shut down nearly 24 embassies during this threat?  Is our intelligence gathering becoming that weak that we cannot identify the actual location of a threat or at least narrow the threat down to a few embassies?  If this threat has some truth, and we received similar threats to our buildings in Benghazi, then why did we not have a stronger force buildup in that location or was Ambassador Stevens expendable?  And who made the intelligent decision that a film nobody heard of was responsible for the Benghazi attack? 

Now, if you were an Al Qaeda terrorist, would you follow through with your terror attack against our embassies or just put it off until they reopen.  I mean are the terrorist that dumb?  Maybe years ago, but today you would think you would just wait for a better time and pick out the easier targets.   We know our embassies have been targets in the past, and attacking them is a boost for terrorist groups and a recruiting tool, but why do it when you can wait another day unless you have no other option available.  Or why not just come across our open border and perform these attacks on our homeland that would a boom for recruiting. After all, according to DHS our border is not a problem.

So, is this threat something that has been blown out of proportion for political purposes or is it real.  There is nothing this administration does, that is not done for political purposes.  After all, when this threat was announced, the president went out and played golf.  What does that tell you?