Why is the Government not pushing these effective COVID medications? As effective as Ivermectin should have been promoted to the public and widely used to cure COVID patients. They’re trying to hide something from us…. Maybe government funding is at stake?
In the first months of
the lockdown last year, it was previously reported that there’s a potential
treatment for COVID-19 that involves the off-label use of an existing
medication called Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).
The two studies about
the said treatments were conducted by a French doctor and soon after Trump had
announced this said potential treatment, the studies were then dismissed by Dr.
Fauci as “anecdotal”.
It turned out that
trials made by the hospitals about the medication were ineffective as prophylaxis
or as a treatment. All of the studies made in relation to this medication have
resulted that there was something wrong.
Either the dosage was way too high or too low, it was only given to
patients in severe stages impossible to recover or without Zinc, which was
imperative. It seemed as if only minutes later, HCQ and anyone who mentioned it
was viciously attacked for promoting quacks and snake oil.
Another observational
study from prestigious medical journals was also released but the same happened
as they claimed that HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, causing cardiac-related
complications. After these studies were published, the other ongoing trials
were stopped immediately and a warning was issued by the FDA stating not to use
HCQ in treating COVID.
Then, for the first
time in history, the FDA restricted doctors from prescribing an approved
medication for off-label use. The WHO and the rest of the world immediately
followed suit literally stopping all research and testing of HCQ overnight.
And then it was
revealed that the mentioned studies above were fabricated and fraudulent
according to an investigative journalist who analyzed the data. Though they
reasserted these studies, they can no longer take but what they have done.
At the time, it defied
logic for someone to sabotage such an effective and promising medication.
Then In December,
Senator Ron Johnson (WI) held a hearing on potential treatment options for
Covid-19. Dr. Pierre Kory was one of the first to testify and he explained that
he and some of the country’s top practitioners in their field formed a group at
the outset of the pandemic called Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance,
or FLCCC. Their sole objective was to find existing medications that could be
repurposed to treat those with COVID. The doctor said they had discovered
exactly that with Ivermectin. An FDA-approved medication introduced in 1981,
has been prescribed to over 3 billion people as an antiparasitic agent. Dr.
Kory said the medication is proving to be a “wonder drug”, highly effective
both as a prophylaxis and for early treatment of Covid-19.
8 months later we have
witnessed the same disturbing pattern as we saw with HCQ. The group
of doctors who brought news of the treatment to the public has been attacked,
censored, and ridiculed. The video of the United States Senate
hearing described above was even removed from YouTube. Studies and trials
proving Ivermectin’s effectiveness were suppressed and marginalized. Clinical
trials have been sabotaged using the same tactics as we’re used to affec the
HCQ studies, and in one case, the conclusion of a study was rewritten after
being submitted for peer review.
Through subterfuge and
sabotage, censorship and subversion, reports of Ivermectin’s success have been
stymied and contained in the United States.
But those powerful
forces didn’t work everywhere.
Remember that it was
not long ago when India was facing an overwhelming surge in cases and death.
Remdesivir was widely administered and failed miserably.
Faced with an
insurmountable humanitarian crisis of apocalyptic proportion, many areas of
India were willing to try almost anything to stop the suffering and death.
Ivermectin was introduced into the standard treatment protocol against
WHO advisements. In those areas, the virus was obliterated just as Dr. Kory
described. Ivermectin stopped a raging surge of death in its tracks.
The results were
nothing short of miraculous.
With the successful
results of India, the effectiveness of Ivermectin in treating COVID-19 is no
longer debatable. Anyone can see that it is every bit effective as Dr. Kory
described during the senate hearing in December of last year. Yet the FDA warns
against taking Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. While the WHO advises
that Ivermectin only be used to treat COVID-19 within clinical trials, and the
NIH recommends that there is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment
Guidelines Panel.
We know Ivermectin
works. We know Ivermectin is safe, cheap, approved by the FDA, and available
now.
The obvious question is:
Why are the FDA, CDC,
and WHO suppressing Ivermectin?
From the FDA website,
it may be related to Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)?
An Emergency Use
Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of
medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies,
such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Under an EUA, FDA may
allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved
medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or
life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have
been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.
Taking into consideration input from the FDA, manufacturers decide whether and
when to submit an EUA request to FDA.
The Emergency Use
Authorization for the COVID-19 vaccines is contingent upon “…no adequate,
approved, and available alternatives.”.
If the CDC, FDA, or
WHO acknowledge the existence of effective treatment, such as Ivermectin, then
the pharmaceutical companies lose their cash-cow vaccines and their immunity
from liability. The vaccine would be subject to normal safety
requirements with which the vaccines arguably could not meet. Under the
EUA, the safety standard of medication is extremely low.
For instance:
“…FDA must determine
that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks of
the vaccine.”
In other words, the
minimum safety threshold is that it only helps more people than those it hurts.
The lesser of two evils and something is better than nothing comes to
mind. If there were another more effective treatment
option available, those emergency-calibrated standards would no longer
apply.
With the quick
emergence of variants, waning effectiveness of the vaccine’s protection, and
the spike in the number of hospitalizations, we have no effective therapy for
those getting sick. Like before, even after testing positive for
COVID-19, the standard treatment outpatient recommendations are
nearly the same as last year. Go home, rest, drink lots of fluids and
wait for your lips to turn blue before going to the hospital.
An effective therapeutic
and prophylactic treatment like Ivermectin is exactly what is desperately
needed and needed now.
It is just what the
doctor would have ordered if the doctor wasn’t conditioned, pressured, and
threatened of being ostracized to ignore his medical training and only follow
the CDC guidelines.
If you would like to
know more information about the clinical trials and studies of Ivermectin,
please visit:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
Source: The Gateway Pundit
No comments:
Post a Comment