June 6, 2021
This week much has been made of the thousands of emails to
and from Dr. Anthony Fauci. These were obtained as a result of Freedom of
Information Act requests. In my view, it’s not only that the emails prove
what we all knew -- Dr. Fauci is a phony -- it’s the enormous national security
failure and coverup that should concern us.
The Fauci Emails
There’s a caveat from Dr. Jeffrey Satinover on the emails:
1. Almost ALL of the emails are from others to Fauci with
his reply. There are very few, if any (I will have to review) initiated by him.
It is very unlikely this represents his full correspondence using his official
NIH address.
2. The rough per-day number of emails in Jan and Feb, then
May, greatly exceeds March and April.
3. A very large proportion of text with what looks to me
likely to be scientific detail, in others’ comments to Fauci, has been
blocked.
4. The largest proportion consists of requests to Fauci to
speak either at scientific conferences or on major media television programs.
Strikingly:
(a) Fauci refuses almost every invite in a medical or
scientific setting
(b) Fauci accepts almost every invite to go on TV
5. The most striking feature by far, so far, is this:
Fauci’s responses are utterly devoid of either scientific curiosity or depth.
He shows no evidence in these pages at least, of anything but the most
superficial familiarity with viral illnesses. Whenever someone proposes a
helpful idea, he hands it off to a deputy to respond. He is temperate to the
point of vacuity.
As
good an analysis of what we do see in the emails as any comes from the
Washington Free Beacon, which shows that he went from flippancy about the
virus to hair on fire alarmist in a short period to time.
His public statements about the danger often contradicted
his private statements; he downplayed the efficacy of a vaccine, and then when
there was a dramatic decrease in infections after widespread vaccinations, he
emphasized we must all stay vigilant.
I don’t see how anyone could have paid attention to his
public statements, rapid contradictions, unseemly mugging at pressers with
then-President Trump, not to have seen this man for what he was -- shallow,
over his head and extremely political.
His alarmism, downplaying of the likelihood and efficacy of
a vaccine and of remedial therapies like HCQ and Ivermectin, which proved very
effective, cost him any credibility in my eyes long ago. Not to speak of his
weird decision that social distancing was not required in such things
as sexual hookups you arrange online with strangers or
anti-Trump political rallies. Before the emails were public, we saw him falsely deny his
role in funding gain of function research in Wuhan. If after all this, you
thought he was “following the science” or a credible arbiter of public health
measures, you were foolish.
The Political Effects of the Panicdema
The consequences of the panicdema certainly were to the
advantage of the left, as Sundance of Conservative
Treehouse notes:
The stalling of a fantastic economy that was benefiting
every American voter.
• Deployment of mail-in ballots that can be used and
manipulated to achieve fraudulent results.
• Controls over presidential debates to avoid a weak
candidate being exposed or confronted.
• The deployed ‘excuse‘ for a very visible lack of voter
enthusiasm for the puppet (Biden).
In short, without COVID as a tool the manipulated election
outcome is more difficult. The ‘never let a crisis go to waste‘ strategy
includes the necessary precursor of a crisis. Everything downstream was
manipulated political opportunity. All roads lead to “stop Trump.”
No Longer Can the State Cover Up for China
So, you might expect skepticism on the right developed after
a few months of watching him and the CDC in action.
But more significant to my mind was an eye-opening
bit of information first appearing in tweets from Adam Housley. “China is
trying to produce variants that suggest it came from bats to cover up that
coronavirus originally came from a lab.” He later clarified: “US intelligence
has a Chinese defector with Wuhan info. AND China is trying to produce variants
that suggest it came from bats to cover up that coronavirus originally came
from a lab.”
Jennifer Van Laar of Red
State followed up with more information about the defector:
FBI Director Christopher Wray was “ambushed” with the
information, they say, and Langley was also unaware. Sources say DIA leadership
kept the defector within their Clandestine Services network to prevent Langley
and the State Department from accessing the person, whose existence was kept
from other agencies because DIA leadership believes there are Chinese spies or
sources inside the FBI, CIA, and several other federal agencies.[snip] UPDATE
12:30 PM PDT, June 4, 2021
Sources tell RedState the defector has been with the DIA for
three months and that he has provided an extensive, technically detailed
debrief to US officials. In DIA’s assessment, the information provided by the
defector is legitimate. Sources say the level of confidence in the defector’s
information is what has led to a sudden crisis of confidence in Dr. Anthony
Fauci, adding that U.S.
Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) personnel
detailed to DIA have corroborated very technical details of information
provided by the defector.
The connection to the Wuhan lab was suspected by many
scientists for a long time, and information about it was skillfully
buried by persons in the Department of State and intelligence agencies,
as Vanity
Fair reported.
Former Secretary
of State Mike Pompeo confirmed that probes into this were blocked by
these same bureaucrats.
(Incidentally, Michael Walsh reports that the Vanity
Fair article had to have been prepared three months before publication,
which suggests Adam Housley was not the only one who knew what DIA was doing
and what was about to hit the fan.)
Sheryl Attkisson, with documentary proof provided, asserts
in three sections for which I list the headers below, that the U.S.
and Dr. Fauci provided far more financial support for the Wuhan lab's gain of
function work than has been admitted.
1. U.S. Taxpayer Money Did Go to Controversial ‘Gain of
Function’ Research
2. The Gain of Function Research with China Did Not Only
Receive U.S. Support and Money Through the Nonprofit ‘EcoHealth Alliance,’ but
Also Directly
Many media reports refer to several millions of dollars in
tax money sent from the NIH to the Wuhan lab via the New York-based nonprofit
“EcoHealth Alliance.” However, research with the lab, and the lab itself,
received significant additional U.S. support including:
Grants directly from the NIH.
Grants directly from Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the NIH. (See grant numbers highlighted
below.)
3. The Chinese Wuhan Lab Received Direct U.S. Support, in
Addition to the Indirect Grants from EcoHealth Alliance
State Department cables from January 2018 detail assistance from the
University of Texas Medical Branch, including university “researchers… helping
train technicians who work” in the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab. The Texas
lab is supported by Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases under NIH.
Like
Paula Boyard, I think the information about the defector and the connection
to Chinese bioweapons is “very bad.”
In DIA’s assessment, the information provided by the
defector is legitimate,” wrote Van Laar. “Sources say the level of confidence
in the defector’s information is what has led to a sudden crisis of confidence
in Dr. Anthony Fauci, adding that U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases
(USAMRIID) personnel detailed to DIA have corroborated very technical
details of information provided by the defector.”
All of this raises many questions. Why, “suddenly,” did the
U.S. legacy media en masse turn tail and start pointing fingers at China and
doubting Fauci? Why did left-wing outlets like the Washington Post and
BuzzFeed “suddenly” decide it was the right time to drop Fauci’s emails -- just
days after the lab-leak story was “suddenly” no longer verboten on social
media? Fauci’s emails revealed what we’ve been reporting here at PJ Media for
months (mostly behind
the paywall for our VIP subscribers to avoid
the Gestapo social-media censors): that Fauci was working with a
Chinese scientist from the Wuhan lab; that he asked Bill Gates and Mark
Zuckerberg to help with COVID messaging; and that he signed off on funding for
dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan. One gets the sense that
a dam the size of Three Gorges on the Yangtze River is about to blow. The
question will be, as it almost is when political figures are caught in a
coverup: What did they know and when did they know it? And who knew what
was really going on?
If any of this turns out to be true -- particularly the
suggestion that China may have intentionally unleashed the most deadly
bioweapon in world history -- you might want to begin thinking about where
you’re going to spend the U.S.-Sino War. If, as Housley claims, the FBI, CIA,
and other federal agencies are swarming with Chinese spies, it would constitute
the biggest national security failure in U.S. history -- and the most deadly.
Many people question the 2020 election results as to which,
for the first time, serious audits are underway and more promised. Anyone with
functioning brain cells has lost faith in our public health apparat. It
looks as if -- as so often has been the case -- our intelligence services have
failed us, and, in fact, may be seriously infested with enemy spies or sources.
And the White House is helmed by a man with dementia unlikely to effectively
respond to these challenges. It looks like some scary times ahead.
No comments:
Post a Comment