The friends and family
of Keith Lamont Scott, the Charlotte man killed by police this week, portray
him as a “family man” and “likable.” This may be true. However, Scott also
had a long police record that included gun violations. Buried deep in this
Charlotte Observer story, we learn: Scott was convicted in April 2004 of a misdemeanor
assault with a deadly weapon charge in Mecklenburg County. Other charges
stemming from that date were dismissed: felony assault with a deadly
weapon with intent to kill, and misdemeanors assault on a child under 12,
assault on a female and communicating threats.
|
Posted on September 21, 2016 by Paul
Mirengoff in Charlotte
police shooting
Slain Charlotte man had lengthy criminal record
The friends and family of Keith Lamont Scott, the Charlotte
man killed by police this week, portray him as a “family man” and “likable.”
This may be true.
However, Scott also had a long police record that included
gun violations. Buried deep in this
Charlotte Observer story, we learn:
Scott was convicted in April 2004 of a misdemeanor assault
with a deadly weapon charge in Mecklenburg County. Other charges stemming from that
date were dismissed: felony assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill,
and misdemeanors assault on a child under 12, assault on a female and
communicating threats.
In April 2015 in Gaston County Court, Scott was found guilty
of driving while intoxicated.
In 1992, Scott was charged in Charleston County, S.C., with
several different crimes on different dates, including carrying a concealed
weapon (not a gun), simple assault and contributing to the delinquency of a
minor. He pleaded guilty to all charges.
Scott also was charged with aggravated assault in 1992 and
assault with intent to kill in 1995. Both charges were reduced, but the
disposition of the cases is unclear.
(Emphasis added)
And there is this:
According to Bexar County, Texas, records, Scott was
sentenced in March 2005 to 15 months in a state jail for evading arrest. In
July of that year, records show, he was sentenced to seven years in prison on a
conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. A Texas Department of
Criminal Justice spokesman said Scott completed his sentence and was released
from prison in 2011.
(Emphasis added)
None of this means, necessarily, that Scott had a gun when
the police killed him or that the police reasonably felt threatened by him. But
Scott’s record makes it all the more unfair to assume — as the Charlotte
protesters do, explicitly or implicitly — that claims by the police that he was
armed and potentially dangerous are untrue.
No comments:
Post a Comment