Jussie Smollett, Trump and racial hate.

We now have learned that Smollett manufactured this entire race/MAGA hat incident in Chicago.  If you were following this, you would have realized within 48 hours that the story given seemed to have a few flaws.  Smollett has now claimed he wanted to get publicity through a hate crime to bring attention to himself to get a raise on his TV show.  Of course, what better way to get the Hollywood elitist, Socialist Democratic presidential candidates, and the far left news media to run with the story, but make sure that Trump was responsible for all this hate and the Smollett assault.  As we have seen, using a MAGA hat as the impetus for race hatred that can only substantiate the alleged assault as the left news media organizations would make this front page news on the TV networks and newsprint. 

This is what we saw and heard from CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC as well as the Trump hating newspaper that were able to tie in this allegation as part of the Trump racism.  It comes down to this:  “If you are on the left, you are automatically a victim”.  Just imagine all the victims we would see if a socialist was ever elected president.

Now, we should add that Trump was in business for over 50 years before running for president and there was never any allegation of racism from him and his organization.  Nor was he ever involved in any Russian government conspiracy, although it has been reported he has on occasion used Russian dressing on his salad.

Until Obama was elected president we did not see such racial rancor.  It all started in 2009 when Obama claimed the Cambridge Mass. Police Dept. acted stupidly followed up with Ferguson Missouri with “Hands up, don’t shoot” fallacy, the Treyvon incident in Florida, followed up with the Baltimore incident that all showed the allegations against police brutality were false, but it did not stop the DOJ, under Eric Holder from investigating.  At the same time, the outcry was all these incidents were hate crimes against blacks, gays and the entire LBGTQ community and whatever other letters they add.  If you are in law enforcement, wear a MAGA hat, are a Trump supporter you are full of hate, racism, homophobic, Islamophobic, xenophobic and whatever other phobia they can throw out there even if they have to make something up.

Former President Obama started this racial hatred and is responsible for what we are witnessing today.  This is what he meant when he wanted to “Fundamentally Transform the United States”.    His goal was and is to destroy our form of government.   He stated in an interview before he became president that our constitution is wrong and all our rights should come from government.  What the government giveth, the government can take away.   

If you listen to the current socialist democrats campaigning for president, you will hear they all espouse government control of the citizens, businesses and your money regardless of how rich or poor you are. 

Anthony Weiner

Anthony Weiner has been let out of prison to a halfway home.  The headline reads the “The Weiner is out”.  Not sure if they are referring to Anthony Weiner or his pants.

The rich want to be taxed more

We are hearing from the socialist that we should be taxing the rich at 70% or higher.  So, we now hear, Bill Gates, Howard Schultz, Michael Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet and others to name a few who all want to be taxed more.  Of course, what they do not tell you is they do not take a salary from their companies, but get their income for Capital gains, stock options and other legal means.  So, their tax bill based on their net worth is not what you expect.  However, they all state they want to be taxed more, but do you ever see them writing a check to the Federal Treasury for what they believe they should be taxed.  In fact, anyone who believes they are not paying their fair share, should just sit down and write a check to the government.  They will not do this because what they say and what they do is completely different.   It sounds so patriotic to make these claims, but to me, put up or shut up.  Have you ever heard a reporter respond to them to sit down and write a check now for their fair share?  Of course not.  What they are saying is pure, unadulterated bullshit.   

Why Trump Will Win The Wall Fight

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once said, “If my fellow citizens want to go to hell, I will help them. It is my job.” He was expressing the limited role of courts in challenges to federal law. It is not the task of judges to sit as a super legislature to question the agendas of the political branches. They will gladly send Congress to hell. It only needs to point to the destination.

In the matter of the border wall, Congress could not have been more clear where it was heading. It put itself on the path to institutional irrelevancy, and it has finally arrived. I do not agree there is a national emergency on the southern border, but I do believe President Trump will prevail. This crisis is not the making of Donald Trump. This is the making of Congress.

For decades, Congress frittered away control over its authority, including the power of the purse. I have testified before Congress, warning about the expansion of executive power and the failure of Congress to guard its own authority. The two primary objections have been Congress giving presidents largely unchecked authority and undedicated money. The wall funding controversy today is a grotesque result of both of these failures.

Start with the National Emergencies Act of 1976. Presidents have long declared emergencies based on their inherent executive authority. The use of that authority produced some conflicts with Congress, the most famous seen in the case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company versus Charles Sawyer, in which the Supreme Court declared that the federal seizure of steel mills during the Korean War was unconstitutional because Congress had never granted President Truman that authority.

However, Congress later gave presidents sweeping authority under the National Emergencies Act of 1976. While this law allows for a legislative override by Congress, the authority to declare national emergencies is basically unfettered. It is one of many such laws where Congress created the thin veneer of a process for presidential power that, in reality, was a virtual blank slate. At the same time, Congress has continued to give the executive branch billions of dollars with few conditions or limitations.

This is why President Obama was able to go to war in Libya without a declaration and fund the entire war with billions of undedicated funds. Neither House Speaker Nancy Pelosi nor most of the current Democratic leadership made a peep of objection at this. But when it comes to the wall, Democrats have indicated they will rely on the ruling in House of Representatives versus Sylvia Burwell, in which the court declared the House of Representatives had standing to sue over executive overreach and that Obama violated the Constitution in ordering the payment of billions to insurance companies without authorization from Congress.

I was lead counsel for the House of Representatives in that case. Ironically, Pelosi vehemently opposed the litigation as a frivolous and unfounded challenge to presidential authority. We won the case. Superficially, it may look like the wall controversy. Obama sought funds from Congress and, when unsuccessful, acted unilaterally. But Obama ordered the money directly from the Treasury as a permanent appropriation, like the money used to pay tax refunds. Congress had never approved such payments.

Conversely, Trump is using appropriated funds. Like the authority under the National Emergencies Act, Congress gave this money to the executive branch without meaningful limitations. Trump now has almost $1.4 billion in newly approved funds to use for border protection. He has identified about $8 billion in loosely dedicated funds for military construction, drug interdiction, and forfeitures. Even if a court disagreed with the use of this money, Trump has the power and funds to start construction of the wall.

Congress has yielded more and more power to the executive branch over decades. In many areas, it has reduced the legislative branch to a mere pedestrian in government, leaving real governing decisions to a kind of “fourth branch” of federal agencies. For their part, presidents have thus become more and more bold in circumventing Congress. When Obama gave a State of the Union proclaiming his intention to bypass Congress after it failed to pass immigration reform, Democrats applauded loudly.

Many of them, like Pelosi, denounce this unilateral action by Trump yet ecstatically supported the unilateral actions by Obama, including his funding of some critical parts of the Affordable Care Act after Congress denied any funds. Democrats insist Trump can be challenged on his use of emergency authority since they do not believe an emergency exists on the southern border. They will fail spectacularly if the case gets to the Supreme Court. While the source of funding can be challenged, there is no compelling basis to challenge the national emergency declaration.

The reason? Congress has never been particularly concerned over past declared emergencies, which have continued with perfunctory annual renewals. Most such emergencies are entirely unknown to the vast majority of Americans. Indeed, the first proclamation of a national emergency occurred under President Wilson in 1917, “arising from the insufficiency of maritime tonnage to carry the products of the farms, forests, mines, and manufacturing industries of the United States.”

Remember that national emergency over the “anchorage and movement of vessels” with respect to Cuba? How about the national emergency over uncut diamonds from Sierra Leone? Then there were the declarations over property owned by certain figures in Zimbabwe, the presidential election in Congo, and issues concerning Yemen, Burundi, Myanmar, Lebanon, Somalia, and South Sudan. All of these were “national emergencies.”

Curiously, Pelosi has called for the declaration of a national emergency to deal with the “epidemic of gun violence in America.” She also said that she wished Trump would add that declaration but that a “Democratic president can do that.” Yes, a Democratic president certainly could, and that is the key point here. Congress gave all presidents the power to make such declarations, and Pelosi is now making the case for Trump today.

While Democrats insist this emergency declaration is simply an effort to use executive power to get what Congress would not give Trump, any litigation would be an effort to use judicial power to do much the same thing. The House of Representatives would try to convince a federal judge of the merits against a wall, after failing to convince enough members of Congress to override the emergency declaration and a presidential veto.

That brings us back to Holmes. Congress has the authority to rescind the national emergency declaration of Trump with a vote of both chambers. The legislative branch should do so. If Congress cannot muster the votes, however, a federal judge is unlikely to do so. Simply put, the courts were not created to protect Congress from itself. Congress has been heading to hell for decades, and it is a bit late to complain about the destination.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. You can follow him on Twitter @JonathanTurley.

Amazon not going to NYC

There are mixed views on Amazon withdrawing from NYC.  On one hand we have the idiot (aka Alexandria Ocasio Cortez) who with other state representatives protested giving somewhere from $2 to $3 Billion in exemptions to convert a structure in Queens NY to the HQ2 for Amazon.  On the other side of the issue are those who believe that the city and state must give some tax exemptions to get large businesses to locate there which is done by just about all states to land a big corporation.  In that corner was the governor and mayor of NYC among others.  The latest poll number indicated that 70% of New Yorkers supported having Amazon come to NY. 

Amazon was bringing approximately 25,000 jobs where most would have a salary of $150,000 or more.  The anticipated income to the city and state over 10 years was estimated to be a minimum of $25 billion plus.  This does not take into consideration all the other businesses that would profit.  Some of these would be real estate, restaurants and contractors to name a few. Naturally, a certain skill would be required to obtain one of these jobs at Amazon.  I guess since this company is owned by Jeff Bezos, it would not be recommended one wear a MAGA hat to the interview.

A city or state offering incentives to attract business to their state is not unusual and has been done for years.  The benefit to the community with a well-established business cannot be denied.  However, when you are a socialist and anti-business, anti-success and anti-rich then you try to stop any business that is not controlled by government. This is what you do.  What is interesting is the Mayor of NYC is an admitted communist, the governor acts like a socialist and the idiot in congress does not understand how business or economics work and has denied her community jobs and income.  People are lifted out of poverty through a job, not a government handout.  Something the idiot and her stupid followers fail to understand.  But, we might add the idiot and her followers believe Amazon was exploiting their workers.  Let me see, with a salary of approximately $150,000 being offered, I think many would line up for that job and would not think they were going to be exploited.  The only people that would be exploited would be all those that want to live under socialism and the idiot.

We might add for those that do not understand the various names given to different political movements just to make them more attractive to the voter, nothing has really changed.  A progressive, socialist and Marxist are the same ideology, communism.  If you do not know history, then you should read about these failed government control of everything. 

It is going to be interesting to watch the upcoming presidential campaign where the socialist democrats attack each other in an attempt to go one better on controlling the people with their failed programs as those who believe in our constitution as written watch from the sidelines.  By the way, what has Sen. Schumer said?  Still waiting for his response to the loss of this business and income thanks to his socialist comrades. 

This is what socialism brings, despair and poverty while the government decision makers live in luxury.  History has shown this to be a fact.

Taxing the rich, Infanticide and global warming

The Socialist Party, formerly known as Demon-crats, wants to tax those they identify as rich.  So, if you develop an idea and put that idea in motion whether it is Bill Gates with Microsoft, Steve Jobs with Apple, Ford with Ford motor company and the assembly line, Jeff Bezos with Amazon and so many others entrepreneurs that turned their idea into a profitable company that employed thousands and made them rich, you are evil.  This is what our country is all about and why people want to come here legally and illegally.  To make a better life for themselves and family. 

But under the Socialist Party, developing an idea into a profitable business that creates wealth for you, employing thousands, is a crime and you should be taxed heavily for that success.  We already know, according in IRS stats that the rich pay over 75% of taxes in this country.  But, the problem is the Socialist Democrats believe they know how to spend your money better than you do.  We all know how well government spends money.   Taxing the so called rich will not generate the money for all the Socialist Party programs they want to implement.  This means all those who work will pay taxes and see their taxes increase to what some professionals have indicated could hit over 50%.  Remember Obama’s statement, “You did not build that”.

Now we have the idiot, (AKA Alexandria Ocasio Cortez) the new congresswomen who believes we must eliminate planes and use trains, horses, feet, and other non-polluting means of travel.  But trains burn fossil fuels.   Cows must be eliminated due to methane gas they emit and nuclear power is a non-starter.  So, farm equipment will now be a horse and plow with the farmer walking behind.  We will be going back to the 1800’s for farming and transportation.  What is amazing, is the idiot actually has other socialist, including socialist presidential candidates endorsing this plan.  Goes to show where their brains are.  Hope they are enjoying smelling the methane gas where their head is. 

Margaret Sanger was the original founder of Planned Parenthood and her idea of eliminating the unwanted was her plan.  She wanted to eliminate the black race and anyone that could be a burden on society, like disabled, including those born with Down syndrome, Autism, deformities and other medical issues.  She became the impetus for Hitler’s grand design for his ideology of the Aryan race and the Holocaust.  We know how well that worked out.

You can rest assured that the Socialist Democrats will not stop at just Infanticide.   Margaret Sanger’s ideas have now made it into the 21^st century and we can expect it will not stop at just infanticide but will increase to those babies up to 2 years of age who become a medical burden or are diagnosed with some of the aforementioned disabilities.  Many people will say no, but you can rest assured this slow increment will be accelerated in the coming years.  In fact, this was mentioned over 20 years ago by a professor at MIT.  We are seeing an increase in euthanasia for the aging population and those who become a medical burden.  Less we forget, it was former President Obama who stated when trying to pass the Affordable Care Act (AKA Obamacare) that if you become a burden on society through medical issues, just take a pill and go home.  I might add, during the Obamacare debate it was mentioned that the important age group is from 15 years to 55 years of age for healthy individuals.  This implied that those outside this age group had better watch out.    Listen carefully to what these loons are saying. 

Global warming or climate change is not what they want you to believe.  It was reported a few years ago that since 1980, volcanic activity has put more pollution into the atmosphere since man first started a fire.   The United States is the leading country on this planet that has reduced its environmental impact more than any other country on this planet.  The socialist are now claiming that recent hurricanes and are caused by climate change.  However, they do not tell you that violent hurricanes have been landing on our country before Christopher Columbus came within this area.  The destruction hurricanes are causing is because the population have moved closer to the shore compared to just 100 years ago and that is why there is now more of a financial impact.  But, if you do not think this through, you can be easily manipulated.  Remember, in the 1970’s we were facing global cooling, but former VP Al Gore realized he can make a living by the claim of Global warming that had to be changed to climate change to be more suitable for their outrageous accusations.  Yes, there is climate change, spring, summer, fall and winter.  But, the socialist have used the phrase climate change, so regardless of the weather, they will always be right.  Warm, climate change.  Cold, climate change.  Storms, climate change, and so on and on.  Some are getting rich over these claims and they are coming for your wallet.

Animal Life over Human LIfe

Interesting article from Sarasota Florida

Ponce’s Law will make it easier for Florida prosecutors to punish animal abusers with prison.

SARASOTA — Animal rescuer Shono Otto says if people saw animal abusers punished “word would get around.”

“I think that would help the situation,” said the president and founder of Underdog Rescue of Florida, reacting to a case in Manatee County where three animals died from thirst after being abandoned in an apartment.

Sarah M. Wilson, 36, of Sarasota has been charged with two third-degree felonies of animal cruelty in connection with the deaths last February. She allegedly left her two Chihuahuas and a black cat in a unit at Champions Walk Apartments with a large feeder and three large water containers that dried up.

Champions Walk Apartments maintenance supervisor Anthony Oteri noticed the animals while he was doing scheduled repairs to the apartment on Jan. 16, 2018 and took a picture of the dogs barking at home and cowering in a bedroom. He gave them water and an email notice about the dogs was sent to Wilson.

The tenant and sole caretaker for the dogs replied by email stating a caretaker left them out of their cage and they had been take care of. She convinced management they were OK, said Manatee County spokesman Randy Warren.

But alone in Apartment 1610, the animals slowly died when water ran out. A letter was posted on the door of the apartment by management Jan. 31 because of nonpayment of rent and about 27 days later staff at Champions Walk re-entered the apartment after rent went unpaid.

This was the first time Manatee County Animal Services was notified — too late to save any of the three pets that were dependent on a person to care for their most basic needs.

Special prosecutors

Six years ago, when Ed Brodsky became state attorney, he assigned two prosecutors who possessed specialized knowledge and expertise to prosecute animal abuse. The aim was to enhance the sentences given to animal abusers and bring much-needed attention to animal neglect that Otto and other rescuers sought.

“Historically, we had seen animal abusers escape punishment or not punished severely enough,” said Brodsky, who called animals voiceless victims. “We wanted to make sure there was accountability for those who harm animals.”

The prosecutors are trained to prove the crime and work with law enforcement and veterinarians to gather evidence.

“There’s a lot of collaboration,” Brodsky said. “It’s a niche area.”

The maximum penalty for a third-degree felony of animal cruelty is five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. But prison is rare for most animal abusers, who averaged less than 16 points on sentencing scorecards before Oct. 1, 2018, when Ponce’s Law was signed into law.

The Florida statute, named after a Labrador puppy that died of severe abuse in Volusia County, increased the sentencing guidelines for felony animal cruelty from a Level 3 (16 points) to a Level 5 (28 points). This makes it more likely for convicted animal abusers to go to prison.

“It (Ponce’s Law) gave more teeth and punishment for those cases,” Brodsky said.

A person scoring under 22 points cannot be sentenced to prison in Florida and must have 44 points for a prison term. Animal cruelty remains a third-degree felony — a 28-point crime. Points are added for additional offenses, victim injuries, prior record, probation violations, and enhancements such as drug trafficking, theft, domestic violence and sexual assault.

Mitigating factors could reduce a sentence and a judge can depart from the instruction if they explain why.

Assistant State Attorney Andrew Van Sickle, the special prosecutor for the State Attorney’s Office in Sarasota County, says he still needs to prove the defendant is a danger to society in order to get prison. The court can order animal abusers tried after Ponce’s Law went into affect barred from having animals.

Van Sickle says animal cases are treated with “due care of punishment” because there are some people who have good intentions regarding animals.

“What is needed as a prosecutor in these crimes is someone who understands psychologically, the root cause of what happened,” Van Sickle said. “By way of example, we all know the correlation to physical injury to animals and domestic violence — these people who beat animals as a result of their frustrations in life. That carries over to murder and domestic violence.”

But other cases involve hoarders or a person with cats who wants to take care of them, but lost control.

“They had good intent, but psychologically they lost it along the way,” Van Sickle said. “Does that same person deserve five years in Florida state prison? We have to look at the root causes. It’s complex in that regard.”

Van Sickle, who also tries exploitation of the elderly and white collar crimes, says he is proud to work on the animal prosecution team that includes Melissa Gould in Manatee County.

“What is needed as a prosecutor in these crimes is someone who understands psychologically, the root cause of what happened,” Van Sickle said. “By way of example, we all know the correlation to physical injury to animals and domestic violence — these people who beat animals as a result of their frustrations in life. That carries over to murder and domestic violence.”

But other cases involve hoarders or a person with cats who wants to take care of them, but lost control.

“They had good intent, but psychologically they lost it along the way,” Van Sickle said. “Does that same person deserve five years in Florida state prison? We have to look at the root causes. It’s complex in that regard.”

“We have a lot of people who take their own time and money to help these animals,” Van Sickle said. “Without them we couldn’t do this job.”

Gould says she is an animal lover who likes giving back to the community.

“There was a need for the vulnerable part of the community, elderly and animals to be protected,” said Gould about the State Attorney’s Office unit. “I don’t have talking witnesses or victims. When you have a bank robber you have that person get on the stand and talk about it. The way I prove the crime is different — that starts with having a good relationship with law enforcement.”

Animal rescuers and prosecutors agree that protecting animals whose welfare depends on people begins in the community.

“We’re a village; everybody should take a little bit of responsibility to make sure the animals didn’t end up like this,” Otto said. “It all starts with animal services. It starts with neighbors reporting it.”

The Sarasota County Sheriff’s Office Animal Services works with rescue groups and holds animals during court. They provide veterinary care and provide vaccinations for animals that are surrendered or become adoptable.

The facility has taken in wild pigs, horses, cows, rodents, reptiles, and cats and dogs.

 In 2018, Sarasota County animal services was supported by more than 70 volunteers who donated 13,020 hours. They helped facilitate 435 adoptions and transferred 1,123 animals to rescue groups.

There were 922 “lost” animals returned to their owners.

Animal Services has an operating cost of $292,513. They are aided by the work of the sheriff’s agricultural unit.

“We deeply care about the animals in our community,” Brodsky said. “I’m an animal owner myself. As an office, I would assure the community we care deeply about the welfare and safety of our animals. Anyone who harms an animal we will do anything we can to make sure justice is served.”

The Virginia Blackface Controversy

So now we learn that not only did the governor admit dressing in blackface and then the next day deny it, but we now have the AG of the state admitting he dressed in blackface.  With the Lt. Governor in hot water for an allegation of forcible sex, the democrats are losing their mind.  Why?  Because the next in line for governor is a republican, the speaker of the state house.  Therefore, you can be assured that at least one of the three will not be going anywhere because we are talking about democrats here.  As for the republican that could become governor, you will soon learn that when he was a only a few months old, he did poop in his diaper that added to human pollution of earth. 

Pocahontas, liar in "Chief"

Washington Post: Warren Listed Herself As “American Indian” On Texas Bar Registration

The controversy over the past claims of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren being a native American continued this week with a report in the Washington Post.  The Post reported that Warren claimed to be an “American Indian” on her Texas bar registration. Warren has denied claiming the status in her legal career despite being listed or referenced as a minority at a couple of law schools. This is a notable incident because it is a claim written in her own handwriting and was entirely unnecessary for registration in Texas.

Warren recently released a DNA test that showed a small possible fraction of Native American heritage. Stanford University Professor Carlos D. Bustamante is a respected academic in the field who has consulted on the national testing programs.

According to his report, Warren has a Native American ancestor from six to ten generations back. If Warren’s great-great-great-grandmother were Native American, she would be 1/32 Native American but it could date back further to 10 generations — making her only 1/1,024 Native American.  Even a 1/32 heritage may not translate into what most people would view as being Native American,  However Cherokee Nation principal chief Bill John Baker is 1/32 Cherokee by blood.  Warren claims Cherokee and Delaware heritage.

Warren touched off a firestorm with the release. Many noted that she degree of claimed DNA would make a huge number of people Native American. Moreover, tribal leaders were irate about using DNA as all. Cherokee Chuck Hoskin Jr., the tribe’s secretary of state, insisted “Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage.”

I am still unclear why using DNA is such an offense but Warren apologized repeatedly for her test.

The card is damaging for Warren not in the sense that it gave her a professional advantage with the Bar but it shows that she claimed to be a minority without prompting or necessity.

Allegation of Sexual misconduct against Va. Lt. Governor

During the Matt Kavanagh hearings, all the demon-crats were claiming that the accuser must be believed.  However, with the accusation of sexual misconduct against the Lt. Governor, that rule does not apply as he is a demon-crat and the accuser must provide proof.  Except if the accused is a republican naturally.  The old double standard.   Accusations with collaborating evidence only applies if the accused is a demon-crats, since we know that all republicans are homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic and any of type of phobia one can claim.  Phobia of any type does not apply to demon-crats since it is impossible for a demon-crat to be a racist of any type.  Even though the KKK was founded by the demon-crats and was the enforcement arm of the demon-crats for over 100 years.  We must not forget, that the first 11 blacks elected to congress in 1870 were all republicans to the dismay of the demon-crats who went apoplectic. I might add, only with the help of the republicans in Congress was the 1964 Civil Rights bill passed as most demon-crats voted against the bill.

Democratic Party, the party of death

It is becoming obvious, that the Demon-crat Party is now becoming the party of death.  In NY we see where the demon-cratic controlled legislature and the great Gov. Cuomo, the leader of Murder Inc., signed the bill allowing a baby to be murdered on the day of birth.  Not to be out done, the demon-crat Virginia legislature attempted to pass similar legislation but failed by one vote.  We have heard the present Virginia governor described the horror of this bill that when the baby is born they will make the baby comfortable until they decide if they want to kill it.  The demon-cratic controlled legislature in Vermont are attempting to pass similar legislation that is worse than NY.

We are talking about a human being, a full term baby that they are giving the okay to kill.  Today it is the baby in the womb or outside the womb and soon it will be up to age 2 if the child develops an illness. This is coming.  I will also add, if you become sick at any age and become a medical financial burden, you will become a candidate for euthanasia and you will have no say on having your life being eliminated.  However, if you are a dog or cat, you can rest assured the animal will be protected and you will suffer jail time if you kill or abuse the animal. 

In the Senate floor this yesterday, Senator Ben Sasse (R., Neb.) called for unanimous consent on his Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which provides protections for any infants born alive after attempted abortion procedures.

Democratic senator Patty Murray of Washington objected to the bill on the floor, preventing it from receiving unanimous consent. Murray claimed that the legislation is unnecessary because there are already legal prohibitions on infanticide. Murray was the only Democratic senator to come to the Senate floor this evening and left immediately after objecting.

The new Demon-cratic Party motto is, “Vote Demon-crat and die” whether you are in the womb or outside.  Unless you are an animal as most demon-crats appear to be.