The republican tax plan and the democrat’s usual obstruction

As we hear every time the republicans want to do a tax cut, the democrats always raise it is a tax cut for the rich or the republicans want to take away your social security.  Of course, when was the last time the democrats offered a tax cut plan. You would have to go back to 1962 under JFK.  Of course the democrats in congress were not enthused, but the republicans helped get it passed.   

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security

check every month  and then finding that we are getting taxed on the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away' -- you may be interested in the following? 

                                                                                         
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust Fund' and put it  into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

                                                                                            
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) 

     withholding?
A: The Democrat Party.

                                                                                       
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democrat Party, with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US.

                                                                                     
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.  Immigrants moved into this country and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democrat Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it.  But it did get them voters at our expense.

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you

that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away.

And the worst part about it is the usual uninformed citizens believe it.  Mostly democrats and the lamestream media.

Judge Roy Moore and Sen. Al Franken and more

So, approximately one month before the Alabama Senate elections the Washington Post comes out with allegations of sexual misconduct by candidate Roy Moore.  Why the Washington Post waited until the waning moments from the election is for them to disclose.  Especially if these allegations were made public earlier it may have changed the republican nominee.  But, when you are all in for the democrats, why should the Washington Post do otherwise.  How much of these allegations are true remains to be seen, but women are coming out of the woodwork to state their claim.  It is odd, that Mr. Moore was in the public eye for nearly 39 years and as a judge engaged in some controversial actions and yet, no person ever came forward until a month before the election.  Now, I have no idea if these allegations are true or false, but some may have validity to them except for anything that lawyer Gloria Allred is involved in as well as her daughter, Lisa Bloom that has already admitted buying off women who made allegations against Harvey Weinstein.  Sometimes the truth is hard to come by, but fabrications will do.

We are now reading how the left leaning media is now going after Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton for their behavior on all the sex allegations against Bill Clinton since his time as the attorney general in Arkansas back in the 1980’s.  It appears the democrats and their media friends are doing their mea culpa after all these years of covering and ridiculing anyone female who dared to report on Bill.  I wonder if the threat of a possible special prosecutor on Hillary’s time as head of the State Department as well as the private server, Uranium One and the Clinton Criminal Foundation may expose what the media already knew but buried.  

Additionally, at the hearing with AG Sessions it appeared a special prosecutor can only be appointed if a crime was committed.  Now that statement is interesting since the Mueller investigation started when no crime was reported, (since collusion is not a crime) based on a now debunked dossier.  Nobody has explained that remark yet.  Even Rep. Trey Gowdy indicated this in a statement yesterday.  But, since this is an allegation against Pres. Trump, rules and laws do not apply.  The establishment on both sides of the aisle want him gone and they will try everything to accomplish this, but will fail.

Why do I say that?  The election of Donald Trump is like the bible story of the prodigal son.  Our Founders believed they were guided by Divine Providence both in the Revolutionary War and in developing our Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  A review of our history will show many times when the future of our country was bleak, there was a miracle that saved us from the Revolutionary War, the war of 1812, Civil War, WW1, WWII and other instances when darkest hours were upon us.  But, we survived when events took a turn for the better and many believe it was the intercession of a higher power.  

So I believe Pres. Trump is here to bring our country back from the abyss where we are witnessing our citizens turning their back on God and religion, engaging in immorality and under the illusion that communism and socialism is the best form of government.  Of course these two forms of government have never succeeded as we are witnessing in North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba and the former Soviet Union.  So, just as the prodigal son awakened and realized what he gave up and returned back to his father, I believe the people in this country will have an awakening and bring us back from the abyss of our own self destruction.  We are the only country in the history of this planet the world has ever seen and our Founders knew this when they indicated that our rights come from God and not government.  What other country has ever said that?

We have also heard yesterday that our government paid out over $15 million for members of congress that engaged sexual harassment and other sexual activities with staffers and our government used this slush fund to keep the victims silent.  We need to voice our objection to Congress that we want the names of all these elected officials who were involved in this activity so the voters will know come election time next year.  These politicians have jumped all over Judge Moore when some of them may have engaged in the same activity or even worst. (Al Franken)  Those names must not be kept under lock and key, and the public has a right to know.   WHO ARE THOSE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS?  WE WANT ANSWERS.  WE WANT THE NAMES.   

The Texas Shooting

Before the blood of the victims had a chance to dry or the facts were known, we had the democrats among other wackos, some from Hollywood, calling for gun control when the facts indicated a good person with a gun stopped a bad guy with a gun.  

The damage this deranged individual would have done if he was not wounded by the good person with a gun will never be known.  But it is known he had other guns in his vehicle, a 9MM and 22 in addition to the AR-15 he used at the church. Some investigators indicated he may have gone on a shooting rampage in other locations.  

We know he was dishonorable discharged from the military and served a 12 month sentence for domestic violence against his wife and child.  We also know his former in-laws had attended this church on occasion and there was domestic issues involved.  But, we may never know if they were the attended targets since he just entered the church and started shooting and even executed some church attendees. 

This individual had obvious mental issues, preached atheism and condemned those who believe in God.  Well, all I can say is I hope he packed sunblock 5000 where he is going.  But, that decision is left to God. 

We also know, he was denied the right to purchase a gun and under law as a dishonestly discharged member of the military is not eligible to possess a gun as well as the domestic violence charges.  But, he did have in his possession a number of guns (4) that records indicate he purchased, two in Colorado and two in Texas, and it will be up to the investigators to determine who sold him these guns.  He was also working as a security guard at an amusement park and had an unarmed security guard license issued by the state of Texas.  

Just before he died, he telephoned his father and told him he had been shot and may not live much longer.  Again, a good guy with a gun stopped a bad guy with a gun, something the democrats and the mainstream media will not discuss.

Before the liberal news media and the democrats continue their gun control talk, they should examine how Hollywood uses vast amount of gun violence in their movies and all the advertisements we see on TV showing violent video games.  So, unless the democrats and their ilk move to change Hollywood violence, they should shut up. 

It has been shown by mental health professionals that these games and movies can influence what those with mental health issues do.